Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Surprising Pick for Safety, High Returns: Emerging Market Stocks

Though apt to lurch violently from boom to bust, emerging markets stocks do produce higher returns over time — but are they worth all the portfolio whiplash your clients must endure?

Actually, yes — if the advisor orchestrates the client’s portfolio intelligently — according to Servo Wealth Management’s Eric Nelson most recent blog post.

On the face of it, whether emerging market stocks enhance an investor’s portfolio is a legitimate question.

That is because their volatility is of such a higher magnitude that one might think to enhance portfolio returns without nearly as much added risk.

Specifically, Nelson cites the Dimensional Fund Advisors emerging markets value fund’s standard deviation of 27 over the past 16 years; that is close to twice the volatility of DFA’s U.S. large growth portfolio (based on the S&P 500) whose standard deviation was just 15.8 over the same period.

An advisor might rationally seek to improve portfolio return by adding large value stocks, small value stocks, international large value or international small value stocks. All of these had higher returns and higher risk than the S&P 500, but their standard deviations were 19, 21.5, 19.7 and 18.5, respectively.

The riskiest of that bunch, U.S. small value, was around halfway between the S&P 500 and an emerging markets value fund in terms of standard deviation. So one might think twice about staking a position.

Put differently, should a portfolio include emerging-markets value stocks — whose average annual return over the past 16 years was a whopping 12.4% — when adding international small value, which returned 10.8% over the same period, nearly matches the return advantage with so much less risk (18.5 vs. EM’s standard deviation of 27)?

The surprising answer is yes, and the reason Nelson gives is that “investors don’t buy positions, they own portfolios.”

The Oklahoma City-based fee-only advisor demonstrates the magic of diversification by comparing an all-stock developed markets portfolio (70% U.S., 30% international) returned, over the past 16 years, 8.6% annually with a standard deviation of 17.8.

Yet a similar 70-30 mix, this time including emerging markets (in addition to international large value and international small value), returned 9.2% with a standard deviation of 18.3.

Writes Nelson:

“The return increased by 0.6% per year, while the standard deviation (risk) of the portfolio only increased by 0.5%.  Over a period of more than 15 years, a 0.6% per year higher return would lead to $0.38 more wealth for every $1 initially invested, while a half-percent increase in volatility is almost unnoticeable.”

Practically a free ride.

And Nelson finds another implication for safety-seeking investors. By rearranging the portfolio to include a 15% allocation to high-quality short-term bonds but by including just an 8.5% stake in emerging markets (within the 85% stock portion of the portfolio), an investor would earn the same 8.6% return as the developed-market-stocks-only portfolio, but with a standard deviation of just 15.5 rather than 17.8.

Whether maximizing returns or limiting volatility is the goal, emerging markets stocks seem poised to help long-term investors, Nelson concludes.

But beyond the principled basis for their inclusion, ThinkAdvisor asked if their poor recent performance further strengthens the case for emerging market stocks.

“You don’t have to be a market timer to realize that emerging market returns have been negative or in the low single digits for the last several years, so they’re cheaper on a relative basis,” Nelson says.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if over the next 3 to 5 years, emerging markets stocks do several percentage points better than U.S. stocks because that’s how things work,” he adds in a nod to the mean reversion investing principle.

“So the long-term case for including them in a portfolio is there," he says. "And as to the short-term basis, there’s almost no case I can think of for excluding them right now. So you have all your bases covered.”

---

Related on ThinkAdvisor:

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

Crippling hack forced Sony to use old BlackBerrys

You can buy a Sony-style hack   You can buy a Sony-style hack NEW YORK (CNNMoney) The cyberattack on Sony was so bad, employees there were forced to resort to an ancient technology -- the BlackBerry.

Executives also used the tried-and-true tactic for relaying messages: a phone tree.

CEO Michael Lynton told the Wall Street Journal Tuesday that it took him more than a day to fully understand the severity of the attack.

It was crippling.

Hackers stole troves of data, leaking movies and internal documents exposing private company memos, along with employees' salaries, Social Security numbers and health information.

Plus, the company's entire computer system was down during the week of Thanksgiving. Here's some of the ways workers coped, a Sony spokesman told CNNMoney:

Execs set up a phone tree, so they could update each other about the hack. One person would relay the message to the next person on the "tree."

Employees used personal cellphones, Gmail accounts and notepads.

Paychecks were cut manually.

Old BlackBerrys, which operate on a different server, were revived to send emails.

'The Interview' has $1M box office debut   'The Interview' has $1M box office debut

The FBI has presented evidence that North Korea was behind the hack. It came just before Sony was about to release "The Interview," a comedy about a plot to kill North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un.

But some security experts hackers and people familiar with Sony's computer networks aren't so sure it was North Korea that pulled it off.

Monday, December 29, 2014

McDonald's vs. Taco Bell breakfast war goes viral

The breakfast war has turned to Twitter.

As Taco Bell launches into the $50 billion fast-food breakfast market, competitor McDonald's is not keeping quiet.

Late Friday night, McDonald's tweeted a picture of Ronald McDonald crouching down to pet a Chihuahua with the words "Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."

The battle goes both ways. Taco Bell gathered 25 men named Ronald McDonald from all over the country and featured them in their newest ad. The men all introduce themselves and express their love for Taco Bell's new breakfast.

STORY: 'Ronald McDonald' hypes new Taco Bell breakfast

McDonald's replied with a tweet: "Breaking! Mayor McCheese confirms: Ronald, in fact, still prefers McDonald's."

McDonald's also announced another competitive move: free cups of McCafe coffee during regular breakfast hours from March 31 through April 13.

Taco Bell's 14 breakfast offerings rolled out on March 27.

Among the options: the Waffle Taco (warm waffle wrapped around sausage patty or bacon with eggs, cheese and syrup); A.M. Crunchwrap (scrambled eggs, hash browns, cheese and bacon or sausage in a flour tortilla); Cinnabon Delights (poppable Cinnabon treats).

Right now, McDonald's is the industry leader at fast-food breakfast with about a 25% market share.

Contributing: Bruce Horovitz

Sunday, December 28, 2014

Retail Sales Rise Solidly in December, but Auto Sales Slip

december consumer spendingFrederic J. Brown, AFP/Getty Images WASHINGTON -- A gauge of U.S. consumer spending rose more than expected in December, suggesting the economy gathered steam at the end of last year and was poised for stronger growth in 2014. The Commerce Department said Tuesday retail sales excluding automobiles, gasoline, building materials and food services, increased 0.7 percent last month after a 0.2 percent rise in November. The so-called core sales correspond most closely with the consumer spending component of gross domestic product. Economists polled by Reuters had expected core retail sales to rise 0.3 percent in December. The increase suggested consumer spending accelerated in the fourth quarter from the third quarter's 2 percent annual pace. It was also the latest indication of strong momentum in the economy at the end of 2013. Though job growth stumbled in December, that was largely seen as temporary given the cold weather that gripped parts of the country during the month. "Weather aside, if we're right in thinking that the underlying trend in jobs growth is still improving, households will continue to spend more freely in 2014," said Paul Dales, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics in London. "Overall, this report supports our view that a 4 percent annualized rise in real consumption will help to generate a decent 3 percent gain in overall GDP in the fourth quarter of last year," he added. U.S. stock index futures extended gains on the report, while prices for U.S. Treasury debt were little changed. A stock market rally last year and rising home values have boosted household wealth, encouraging Americans to open their wallets a little bit more. Core sales last month were lifted by a 1.8 percent rise in receipts at clothing stores. Sales at food and beverage stores recorded their largest increase in seven years. There were also increases in online store sales. A cold snap during the month likely contributed to holding down sales of automobiles. Receipts at auto dealers fell 1.8 percent, the largest decline since October 2012. Auto sales had risen 1.9 percent in November. That limited overall retail sales to a 0.2 percent gain in December. Retail sales increased 0.4 percent in November. Economists had expected retail sales to edge up 0.1 percent last month. For all of 2013, retail sales rose 4.2 percent. Retail sales excluding automobiles rose 0.7 percent. Sales of furniture, sporting goods, building materials and garden equipment and electronic appliances fell. A separate report from the Labor Department showed import prices were unexpectedly flat in December, showing no signs of imported inflation. Domestic inflation continues to trend lower and the lack of price pressures mean the Federal Reserve will likely keep interest rates near zero for a while even as it scales back its monthly bond purchases.

Penn Virginia: 10% Today, 100% Tomorrow?

How do you make an oil production & exploration company pop? Propose it can double in the next year and highlight it as a possible takeover target to boot.

REUTERS

That’s what happened today to Penn Virginia (PVA), which has popped 9.7% to $10 after SunTrust Robinson Humphrey said it was a “top takeover target this year.” Oh, they also named it as a top pick, praised its “operational excellence,” and cited numerous catalysts.

Analyst Neal Dingmann and Ryan Oatman explain:

Penn Virginia is not only likely to see materially higher production growth from its six rigs drilling continuously improving wells, but the company should see over 25% cash flow growth from drilling production combined with drilling/completion efficiencies. The company should be able to fund the growth not only from cash flow but through asset sales such as the recently announced $100 million sale of its Eagle Ford gas gathering system. Channel checks not only signal continued improving well results, but also numerous drilling efficiencies that should considerably boost production and lower well costs / capital expenditures.

Now about that takeover potential. Dingmann and Oatman write:

Nearby acquisition highlights Penn Virginia's value. Devon Energy (DVN) recently agreed to acquired Eagle Ford Shale assets in DeWitt and Lavaca Counties from private GeoSouthern Energy for $6 billion. The assets consist of 53,000 boe/d and 82,000 net acres with over 1,200 drilling locations all in DeWitt and Lavaca Counties. We calculate the deal at $3.975B for the 53,000 boe/d of existing production assuming recent Eagle Ford deal rates of $75,000 per flowing Boe and $2.025B for acreage or ~$25,000/acre after netting out the production. We calculate that if all acreage was the same, Penn Virginia trades at roughly 25% of the value of the latest acquisition, and nearly as large a discount even after taking into account some acreage differences.

All in all, Dingmann and Oatman see Penn Virginia trading $18, nearly twice Friday’s close of $9.12.

Saturday, December 27, 2014

5 Big Short-Squeeze Stocks Ready to Pop

BALTIMORE (Stockpickr) -- Anxiety is so thick in the air on Wall Street right now, you could cut it with a knife. But that extreme in investor sentiment is creating big opportunities for investors who can see through it right now.

>>5 Stocks Ready to Break Out

When most investors hate a stock, you should take notice. After all, buying a name that the bears are piling into has historically been a pretty good strategy to beat the market.

Going back over the last decade, buying heavily shorted large and mid-cap stocks (the top two quartiles of all shortable stocks by market capitalization) would have beaten the S&P 500 by 9.28% each and every year. That's some material outperformance during a decade when decent returns were very hard to come by.

When I say that investors "hate" a stock, I'm talking about its short interest. A stock with a high level of shorting indicates that there are a lot of people willing to bet on a decline in its share price -- and not many willing to buy. Too much hate can spur a short squeeze, a buying frenzy that's triggered by shorts who need to cover their losing bets. And with the rally we've been since last November, you can probably guess that there are lots of losing open short bets.

>>5 Hated Earnings Stocks You Should Love

One of the best indicators of just how high a short-squeezed stock could go is the short interest ratio, which estimates the number of days it would take for short-sellers to cover their positions. The higher the short ratio, the higher the potential profits when the shorts get squeezed.

It's worth noting, though, that market cap matters a lot -- short sellers tend to be right about smaller names, with micro-caps delivering negative returns when the same method was used.

>>5 Big Trades for a Market Top

Today, we'll replicate the most lucrative side of this strategy with a look at five big-name stocks that short sellers are piled into right now. These stocks could be prime candidates for a short squeeze in 2013.

Salesforce.com

Investors in Salesforce.com (CRM) got their first taste of a squeeze last Friday, as shares of the $30 billion software maker got boosted by 12.5% on the heels of positive earnings news. Friday's bump added some much-needed relative strength to CRM's year-to-date performance, pushing shares' 2013 gains to a market-beating 18%.

But shorts are still squarely betting against Salesforce.com right now. With a short interest ratio of 16, it would take more than three weeks of buying pressure for short sellers to cover their positions.

>>4 Big Tech Stocks on Traders' Radars

Salesforce.com makes business software that customers use to interact with their customer databases. That makes CRM's offerings a must-have application for its 100,000 customers. The firm's web application lets users handle everything from sending newsletters to tracking sales. And since the Salesforce.com platform has a direct, measureable correlation to sales, it's easy for customers to justify paying the bill.

Salesforce was one of the first big software companies to make the move to the "cloud." By offering software hosted online, the firm avoids piracy concerns while at the same time adding new user benefits and converting its business to an attractive subscription-based model. Customers tend to be stickier because they've invested in the firm's platform; because integration takes place deep in the product, switching costs are extremely high for customers considering jumping to a competitor's product.

With a defensible moat and positive earnings momentum this quarter, this stock looks like a prime short squeeze candidate.

IntercontinentalExchange

Eyes are on IntercontinentalExchange (ICE) in 2013, as the firm gets closer to closing its acquisition of NYSE Euronext (NYX), expected to happen this fall. And merger arbitrageurs are taking full advantage of any crumbs left in the deal, contributing to ICE's short interest ratio of 22.6 right now. Ultimately, it doesn't matter why a stock is being heavily shorted, only that it is.

So the fact that it would take shorts in ICE a month to exit their bets at current volume levels makes this a short squeeze candidate even if no one really hates the stock.

>>3 Stocks Rising on Unusual Volume

IntercontinentalExchange operates the world's biggest exchanges for niche OTC derivatives, helping to match buyers and sellers of more specialized securities. The firm's clearing business is a very attractive complement to its exchange and OTC trading arm -- it essentially lets ICE fill a role that a third-party would otherwise get a piece of anywhere else. Energy and agriculture are core markets for IntercontinentalExchange. The firm's products are critical for commercial hedgers, and as a result, ICE can command bigger benefits than it would be able to grab if it dealt with more competitive instruments.

The NYX acquisition is going to be transformational for ICE -- it'll give it exposure to more mainstream securities for starters, and it'll let ICE leverage some of the most storied brands in the financial sector. While the deal will lever up ICE's balance sheet as well, it should be immediately accretive to income once one-time merger charges run their course.

Lululemon Athletica

Apparel maker Lululemon Athletica (LULU) is on the exciting end of a big trend in sportswear. The firm was a pioneer in the yoga apparel niche, launching stylish workout gear at the exact same time yoga started to become extremely popular with American consumers. Today, the Vancouver-based firm also boasts more than 220 retail stores spread across the U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

>>5 Cash-Rich Stocks to Triple Your Gains

Lululemon's position in the market gives it the ability to collect premium prices for its merchandise -- and it shows. The firm generated around $2,000 per square foot of retail space at its company owned stores last year, making it one of the most productive apparel sellers out there. Third-party sales channels offer LULU a zero-risk way to move its workout gear, especially as competitors vie for LULU's customers and brand fragmentation becomes more apparent. As Lululemon moves from being a yoga-wear maker into more general athletic apparel its strong brand should help it maintain a niche advantage.

Despite its upside prospects, LULU is best known on Wall Street for being a volatile name. That's helped push its short interest ratio to 11.9, a level that makes it a short squeeze candidate. Any hint of earnings surprise next week could spark fast buying. Keep an eye on this one.

Banco Santander Chile

It's been a pretty brutal year for shares of Banco Santander Chile (BSAC). Shares of the $10.5 billion Santiago-based bank have slipped more than 21% since the first trading day in January, hit by weakness in emerging markets and inflation concerns specifically in the Chilean peso. That's helped ratchet short interest in BSAC to a lofty 19.7.

>>5 Rocket Stocks to Buy in September

Santander Chile is essentially a bet on the robustness of the Chilean economy. While that argument hasn't held much weight lately, with emerging market economies falling flat versus established markets like the U.S., investors shouldn't forget the capital magnetism that Latin America recently provided. A stable economy in Chile combined with low credit penetration should provide an attractive combination for Santander Chile. The firm's primary customer base has ample runway ahead of it.

Investors are understandably concerned about exposure to the Chilean peso, a currency that has seen more than one iteration in most investors' lifetimes. But better currency controls have helped to curb inflation -- and the peso's biggest risks come from the perpetual strength of the U.S. dollar these days, not a return to hyperinflation. Chile's biggest bank looks cheap this fall after getting sold off hard; a short squeeze could bring shares back to where they should be.

Chipotle Mexican Grill

2013 is panning out to be a stellar year for shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG). The $12.5 billion fast-casual restaurant chain has rallied more than 36% since the start of the year. But even though short sellers in CMG are feeling the pain right now, they're not paring down their bets against Chipotle. As I write, Chipotle sports a short interest ratio of 12.1.

That means it would take almost three weeks of buying at current volume levels for shorts to exit this stock.

>>3 Huge Stocks to Trade (or Not)

Chipotle has seen huge success by offering a simple menu of high-quality ingredients. Today, the firm boasts more than 1,500 restaurants in 43 states and four countries. While many competitors have stepped in for a piece of CMG's market, Chipotle's brand positioning as a seller of less-processed, more-natural meats and dairy products isn't easily replicated. At the same time, there's significant room for growth domestically, where Chipotle's stores are concentrated in a few core areas. Expansion beyond North America remains challenging, but CMG's limited store footprint overseas is showing a few glimmers of hope.

From a financial standpoint, a debt-free balance sheet is impressive. To date, CMG has managed to finance new store openings primarily with retained earnings, a fact that adds substantial value to shareholders' positions. As CMG continues to execute in 2013, short sellers should be wary of more of the same.

To see these short squeezes in action, check out this week's Short Squeezes portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Jonas Elmerraji in Baltimore.


RELATED LINKS:



>>3 Biotech Stocks Triggering Breakouts



>>5 Sin Stocks Ready for Dividend Boosts



>>3 Tech Stocks Spiking on Big Volume

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Jonas Elmerraji, CMT, is a senior market analyst at Agora Financial in Baltimore and a contributor to

TheStreet. Before that, he managed a portfolio of stocks for an investment advisory returned 15% in 2008. He has been featured in Forbes , Investor's Business Daily, and on CNBC.com. Jonas holds a degree in financial economics from UMBC and the Chartered Market Technician designation.

Follow Jonas on Twitter @JonasElmerraji


Thursday, December 25, 2014

Why Abercrombie's Earnings Came Up Too Short

Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF  ) just saw a first quarter that came up too short for investors. Overall sales are down 8.9% and the company's stock price plummeted 8% immediately following its earnings release.

A dismal quarterly report almost seems like karma for Abercrombie -- it not only comes on the heels of the resurfacing of CEO Mike Jeffries' controversial 2006 comments about only wanting good-looking clientele, but also after news that Abercrombie refuses to produce clothing above a size 10. While the controversies may not have affected Abercrombie's sales this quarter, there are several reasons behind the first-quarter backslide. Let's take a look at the nitty-gritty of this struggling retailer.

Inventory
According to Jeffries, Abercrombie's first-quarter decrease in sales was largely due to a lack of merchandise. The CEO cited "more significant inventory shortage issues than anticipated," which included lags in deliveries for the company's spring 2013 line of clothing.

This incident is a complete reversal of fortune from Abercrombie's 2012, during which the company had far too much inventory on its hands and had to majorly mark down items. Jeffries believes the company is through the worst of the clothing shortage, though, saying, "with the inventory headwinds largely behind us, we expect to see continued sequential improvement in the second quarter."

Changing tastes of American teens
Abercrombie isn't the only trendy retailer that has just had a depressing quarter. One of its closest rivals, clothier Aeropostale (NYSE: ARO  ) , is also suffering. Aeropostale's stock sank 10%, even lower than Abercrombie's, following its earnings call, which revealed a 9% drop in revenue and a 14% decline in comparable-store sales. Seeing both companies suffer so similarly may lead some to wonder if teen tastes are starting to turn elsewhere.

This wouldn't be wholly surprising. In the past, companies like Abercrombie, Aeropostale, and even Urban Outfitters have excelled at capitalizing on the tastes of the American teenager. At its best, this demographic is a wildly profitable one, and at its worst, it is incredibly volatile, with no guarantee of continued brand loyalty.

Throwing millions of dollars into research and development can pay off in the short term, but inevitably these customers grow up, and so do their tastes. While this makes way for a new crop of teens (and thus fresh revenue), there's no way to predict with 100% accuracy what these new consumers will like, much less whether it will be at all similar to the previous generation's tastes. For the moment at least, stores like Abercrombie appear to be suffering at the wrong side of this gamble.

So what does it mean?  Abercrombie isn't necessarily drowning, but its latest earning call might suggest that long-term investing in teen culture is a highly risky choice. If you can't tell whether the company will have its same customer base in 10 years, or even if its products will maintain their appeal in 10 years, you probably shouldn't trust it a chunk of your portfolio to it.

The retail space is in the midst of the biggest paradigm shift since mail order took off at the turn of last century. Only those most forward-looking and capable companies will survive, and they'll handsomely reward those investors who understand the landscape. You can read about the 3 Companies Ready to Rule Retail in The Motley Fool's special report. Uncovering these top picks is free today; just click here to read more.

Here's Why Giggles N Hugs is Eating McDonald's and Wendys Lunch (WEN, GIGL, YUM, MCD)

Hey McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) and Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE:YUM), the reason you're struggling isn't likely the reason you think. Yes, McDonald's, you have logistics problems, and Yum! Brands [purveyor of Pizza Hut, KFC, and Taco Bell], offering an alternative to burgers to a burger-lovin' world doesn't always make life easy. That's not your biggest hurdle, however. You're biggest hurdle is much more nuanced, admittedly a little obscure, and multiple in number. Winning and keeping market share can be done though. As proof that it can be done, one only has to look at Giggles N Hugs Inc. (OTCMKTS:GIGL), which is actually growing by giving kids AND parents what both of them REALLY want.

In an informal survey performed by parenting-trials website www.dad-camp.com in September of this year, parents opined about what they wanted/needed from a kid-friendly restaurant. Price and speed didn't make the list, even though the entire fast-food industry was and still is built for the primary purpose of serving up cheap food in a hurry... a mindset put into motion by McDonald's years ago. The biggest concerns of parents who dared to drag their kids to an eatery were (1) a patient, understanding staff, (2) a menu with a choice, (3) kid-sized accoutrements, and (4) entertainment.

To be fair, your typical McDonald's or Yum! Brands believes they're kid-friendly, in the sense that a kid can get a variety of burgers, fried chicken, Mexican food, or pizza. And, the box most kid-meals come in are covered with puzzles and games that could technically qualify as "entertainment." Some McDonald's and Wendys Co. (NASDAQ:WEN) restaurants even have a jungle-gym to climb on. That's not the choice and entertainment parents are talking about, however, particularly on the menu front, but also on the entertainment front.

See, the trend of rising expectations on the entertainment and selection front has intersected with another trend.... healthier eating.  In another poll recently taken by the National Restaurant Association, it was found that 72% of consumers are more likely to visit a restaurant that offers distinctly healthy options, and 64% are more apt to visit a restaurant that offers locally-grown food. 

For perspective, a McDonald's cheeseburger, small fries, milk, and apple slices (your typical Happy Meal) packs a whopping 645 calories. A Yum! Brands KFC kids meal consisting of a Chicken Little sandwich, macaroni and cheese, a Capri Sun drink, and a side of apple sauce served up 570 calories. Compared to a suggested daily intake of between 1200 and 1400 calories for 4 to 8 year olds and only 1600 to 1800 calories per day for 9 to 13 year olds, the problem becomes clear in a hurry. The healthier-eating  trend is growing fast, driven by concerned parents who are now realizing in earnest the downside of processed and packaged foods. They're steering their kids clear of it altogether, choosing organic where feasible, and ideally, choosing locally-grown.

It's a trend that flies right in the face of your typical operation at a Wendy's or McDonald's restaurant, but plays right into the hand of your typical Giggles N Hugs locale.

What's Giggles N Hugs? Think Chuck E Cheese, but with more stimulating play areas and a much, much healthier menu. While pizza is available at Giggles N Hugs, it's not the typical grease-laden, fat-filled pizza you'll find at many of America's favorite pizzerias like Pizza Hut or Chuck E Cheese. Among its favorite pizzas are the veggie pizza and the gourmet pizza, topped with goat cheese, sun-dried tomatoes, and eggplant. It's not the kind of thing most kids would eat at home, but somehow children find a different palate in the right environment.

It isn't a household name, except perhaps in the Los Angeles area where the fast-growing chain operates three stores. More are on the way, though; the organization would like to open a couple dozen more by 2018, and at the same time widen its product to include branded sales of clothing and food. It's this impending growth and capitalization on a trend towards healthier lifestyles that has made GIGL such a compelling investment.

And the proof of the proverbial pudding is in on top of the pizza crust, so to speak. Giggles N Hugs Inc. reported its third quarter revenue. Sales were up 49% on a year-over-year basis, reaching $913,000 versus $615,000 in the third quarter of 2013. Sales were up considerably on a sequential basis too, from Q2's top line of $822,000. That growth alone confirms the premise has been well-received by patrons, who continue to come back as more newcomers step in. Likewise, that growth bodes well for the company's planned expansion efforts.

As of right now there are only three Giggles N Hugs locales, all in malls in the Los Angeles area. More are planned, however. The company aims to have 25 units in place by 2018, which would put the organization on pace to be generate $40 million or so per year within the next four years. That's a lot of revenue relative to the market cap of $9.1 million, and with the first three units more than proving the concept is marketable, it's tough to imagine the company not living up to that potential.

For more on Giggles N Hugs Inc., visit the SCN research page here.

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Boeing Confident About Future Demand Despite Dipping Oil Prices

What's happening to the global oil prices is nothing less than amusing. Brent Crude Oil, which cost more than $120 a barrel back in 2011, is now down to almost $60 - a mind-boggling 50% drop. Now, in the context of aircraft manufacturing, this becomes so important because many industry experts and analysts are fearing aero majors may need to slow down by reducing their ongoing production rate. Will that be necessary for Boeing (BA)? How will all this affect the company? Let's take a look.

Why are there talks about slowing down?
In one of my previous articles where I was speaking of Bombardier's (BDRAF) troubles because of the drop in oil prices, I had mentioned that analysts are expecting the oil prices to drop as low as $60 a barrel. It seems that time has come as Brent Crude oil price touched $60.79 a barrel according to NASDAQ. The following is chart shows the fluctuations in the Brent Crude Oil Spot Price. The latest spot price is as of December 15, 2014.

So, why am I speaking of this? Well, dropping oil prices are becoming a major concern for aircraft makers globally since it might affect the demand for the new age fuel-efficient aircraft. Boeing is working on multiple fuel-efficient models that are expected to support the future of air travel. The American jet maker's 787 Dreamliner, 777X and the 737MAX are all targeted towards customers seeking lower operating costs and fuel economy. The company has spent billions of dollars on research and development and finally now when the time has come to enjoy the fruits of the hard work, the plunging oil prices might spoil the fun.

Airlines might feel it's better to carry on with the existing fleet, since fuel costs are going down, compared with spending millions or billions on acquiring new jets. If the demand for these jets slow down, the jet maker will be forced to cut down the production rate so that it can continue operating the manufacturing facilities without experiencing a production gap, until the demand is back on track.

Is Boeing thinking of slowing down?
It would be wrong to deny that there are ample reasons to worry. However, the aero giant seems to be confident of the future demand and doesn't feel a production rate cut will be necessary. A recent report by Scott Hamilton highlights certain points that Boeing mentioned in a message that it sent out to aerospace analysts regarding concerns about impact of falling oil prices.

According to the report, Boeing mentioned that it had successfully bagged more than 3,000 aircraft orders between 2005 and 2007 when oil averaged $60 a barrel – the same as the present times. This suggests that the company believes it has a similar chance now also. Secondly, the American company believes aircraft orders are more correlated to airline profits than oil prices. The company is confident that its value proposition of 20% better fuel-efficiency will continue to be attract newer buyers. Thirdly, the total value proposition extends beyond just fuel efficiency and the other factors will help in maintaining demand.

Parting thoughts
Aviation industry expert Scott Hamilton said, "We have received many calls from media and the financial community about the impact of oil. We tell these callers that we see no prospect of cancellations or deferrals on narrow-bodies, where the vast majority of the backlog is, due to low oil prices. Any cancellations or deferrals will be due to individual circumstances of the customer."

The present drop in oil prices have raised a lot of concerns. However, thinking practically, one honestly can't expect oil prices to be at this level forever. Slowly, the prices will again rise and then the doubts regarding the fall in demand will also fade away. Boeing has already realized this and now the investors need to understand this and keep faith in the company.

About the author:Quick PenA seasonal writer with a Management Degree in Finance and interests in automotive, technology, telecommunication and aerospace sectors.
Currently 0.00/512345

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)

Email FeedsSubscribe via Email RSS FeedsSubscribe RSS Comments tha23794Tha23794 - 11 hours ago

my Aunty Alyssa got a very cool Volkswagen Beetle Convertible from on

9 Ways to Deal With Debt in Retirement

Senior African American couple paying bills Getty Images What do you want to do when you retire? I'm guessing paying down debt isn't on your short list. Unfortunately, for many Americans it is. Mortgages, credit card debt, student loans and supporting elderly parents are affecting the retirement plans of many baby boomers. The financial crisis devastated home values and retirement accounts, and a general lack of planning left little time for boomers to recover the losses. A Fidelity Investments survey showed that almost half of all baby boomers who have pensions expect to retire with debt, with one if five of them saying they did no planning before retirement. Also, a 2012 Demos study found that people 65 and older have more credit card debt than any other age group -- $9,300 on average. Demos suggested that the recession reduced savings and forced those in or near retirement to cut back. "I don't think people are making a conscious decision to carry debt," Lori Trawinski, senior strategic policy adviser at AARP Public Policy Institute, told Kiplinger. "People have no choice, because they have other obligations they need to take care of." If you are nearing retirement or already retired, how do you pay down debt? Here are eight ways to get some relief. How to Pay Down Debt in Retirement 1. Consult a professional. A certified financial planner can help you build a retirement plan, including specific benchmarks so you can dig out of debt and build savings. A CFP can also help you build an overall retirement spending plan that includes debt payments, fixed expenses and anticipated sources of retirement income. 2. Know your benefits. The National Council on Aging, a nonprofit service and advocacy organization that improves the lives of older adults, runs a website called BenefitsCheckup.org. The site has a tool to help you make sure you are receiving all the benefits you are entitled to. These benefits can help you pay for medications, health care, food, utilities and more. 3. Downsize. This is a very emotional decision but selling your house and moving into something much smaller and more affordable will free up cash for living expenses. Ditching your high-maintenance house means you will be free of high mortgage payments and expensive maintenance, insurance and tax bills. 4. Accelerate your mortgage payments. This is only a good option if you have mortgage debt and cash in the bank; this route is not for retirees with other kinds of high-interest debts or low cash reserves. If you compare the interest rate on your mortgage with the current rates on savings accounts and CDs, you might save more money paying down the mortgage instead of keeping the money in the bank. Just don't withdraw from your retirement accounts to pay off the house -- the tax owed on the distributions will cancel out the mortgage savings. 5. Refinance your mortgage. Some retirees have enough equity to refinance their homes, pull out cash, invest the money and try to live off the investments. Retirees might want to avoid using mortgage relief firms, as some debt settlement programs can leave you paying more than the original debt owed. If you do use a mortgage settlement firm, know that the FTC bans these firms from charging upfront fees. Also, be wary of short-term interest rate deals -- those rates can spike later. 6. Get a reverse mortgage. There are risks associated with reverse mortgages: They generally have high fees and interest rates. Also, the loan must be repaid with accumulated interest when the owner passes away, sells the home or no longer uses it as his primary residence. Reverse mortgages are one of the biggest scams targeted at the elderly. Still, they are an attractive option because retirees do not have to make monthly principle or interest payments while living in the home, although they must stay current on tax and insurance premiums. Retirees considering a reverse mortgage should consult a government-approved housing counselor for help. 7. Postpone retirement. Postponing retirement gives you more time to bring in income and pay down debts. Working later means you can also delay claiming Social Security benefits or other sources of retirement income, which gives your savings extra time to compound. This might be a tough pill to swallow if you've had your eye on retiring sooner rather than later, but just a few extra working years might be all you need to eliminate your debts. 8. File bankruptcy. Senior citizens are the fastest growing number of bankruptcy filers. It's an attractive option to retirees, because chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation does not affect 401(k) accounts, social security benefits or home equity. IRAs are also protected up to more than $1 million. Eliminating debts through bankruptcy makes sense for some boomers, who don't have a chance to increase their income so late in life. There are some exemptions to which accounts are or are not affected, which vary by state. It's best to consult a bankruptcy attorney to understand all the implications. 9. Ask for help. There are several nonprofit counseling agencies that help people establish a manageable schedule for repaying debts. Just avoid debt negotiation firms that charge high fees or are scams. Some trusted sources include the Association of Independent Consumer Credit Counseling Agencies and the National Foundation for Credit Counseling. Debt counselors can review your budget and spending and come up with an action plan; some can even offer a reduction or waiver of interest charges and penalties. "No one should be worried about making a credit card payment versus paying for medicine," Leslie Linfield, executive director at the Institute for Financial Literacy, told Kiplinger. "You've contributed to the system your whole life. It's okay to ask for assistance."

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

Hedge Funds Hate These 5 Stocks -- Should You?

BALTIMORE (Stockpickr) -- When the "smart money" piles behind a stock, you know that things are going to get interesting. And when the opposite happens -- when they hate a stock -- it's bound to get even more interesting.

After all, it's the sell list -- the names that institutional investors hate the most -- that represents some of the biggest conviction moves. Scouring fund managers' hate list is valuable for two important reasons: it includes names you should sell too, and it includes names that they're wrong about selling.

You see, hedge funds have a problem on their hands -- they're underperforming the rest of the market in 2014. Year-to-date, the average hedge fund is up just 3.34% according to performance data from BarclayHedge. That's well shy of the S&P 500's 8.7% return so far this year. And that underperformance means that hedge funds are panicking when positions aren't working out quickly.

Pro investors aren't immune from letting their emotions get the better of their trading. And when investors get emotionally involved with the names in their portfolios, they often do the wrong thing.

As a result, in many cases, portfolio managers are leaving money on the table. So today, we're taking a closer look at the stocks they hate the most to figure out where the opportunities lie this fall.

Luckily for us, we can get a glimpse at exactly which stocks top hedge funds' hate lists by looking at 13F statements. Institutional investors with more than $100 million in assets are required to file a 13F, a form that breaks down their stock positions for public consumption. From hedge funds to mutual funds to insurance companies, any professional investors who manage more than that $100 million watermark are required to file a 13F.

So, without further ado, here's a look at five stocks fund managers hate...

Schlumberger

Most of the selling last quarter took place in the energy sector -- and within it, no single stock got sold off as hard by funds as Schlumberger (SLB). All told, funds unloaded more than 4.57 million shares of the oil field servicer, a stake that's worth close to $430 million at current price levels. So, should you sell too? Not so fast.

Schlumberger is the biggest oil service company on the planet. The firm's revenues come from a menu of specialized field services such as seismic surveys and well drilling and positioning. In a nutshell, SLB's job is to pull oil out of the ground as efficiently as possible -- and with oil prices in freefall, SLB's value proposition matters more now than it did when crude was trading in the triple-digits. Oil firms turn to Schlumberger because the tasks they need to accomplish are too nuanced or proprietary to pull off in-house. And that gives the firm a deep economic moat.

Another part of SLB's deep moat comes from boots on the ground. Because Schlumberger is on-site at its clients' well locations, the firm is able to sell more complementary services at one time. The energy sector has gotten shellacked in the last few months, and frankly, that downward pressure isn't showing any signs of letting up. That said, SLB's revenues don't ebb and flow exactly in step with crude prices (unlike its clients), and shares look oversold here.

Chevron Corp.

One of Schlumberger's biggest partners is oil and gas supermajor Chevron Corp. (CVX). No, Chevron isn't the biggest of the oil companies, but it might just be the most attractive from a financial standpoint. Not that that helped the firm avoid fund managers' wrath last quarter -- funds unloaded more than 3.17 million shares of Chevron during the third quarter of 2014, a stake worth more than $365 million today.

Chevron's scale is huge. The firm produces 2.6 million barrels of oil equivalent a day, and sports proven reserves of 11.3 billion barrels. Chevron's outsized exposure to oil (versus the natural gas that peers have been buying up) has hurt it lately, as crude prices fell faster than natgas, no question about it. And because oil companies are basically leveraged bets on commodity prices, as crude gets closer to Chevron's cost of production, there are some real risks to long-term profitability that investors need to be thinking of.

I said earlier that CVX is the best-positioned supermajor financially. That's because the firm currently carries $16.6 billion in net cash and investments, the least-leveraged balance sheet in big energy right now. At current price levels, that net cash level is enough to cover close to 8% of Chevron's market capitalization. Even if Chevron is best-in-breed, it's best in a sketchy breed right now -- oil prices could realistically move lower, and Chevron's technical trajectory is down.

If you're yearning for energy sector exposure, Schlumberger has a more attractive risk/reward tradeoff right now.

McDonald's

Switching gears outside of the energy sector brings us to fast food chain McDonald's (MCD), another name on hedge funds' hate list. McDonald's has had a pretty tepid year in 2014, down 2.6% over a stretch when the S&P is within grabbing distance of double-digit upside. So it's not hugely surprising that fund managers don't have the patience to stick it out with MCD this fall. Funds sold 2.29 million shares of McDonald's over the course of the third quarter...

McDonald's is the biggest fast food restaurant chain in the world, with approximately 35,900 restaurant locations in 125 countries. Of those, nearly 7,000 are company-owned units. The other 80% of stores are franchised. That model has been a cash cow for MCD shareholders in the past, giving the firm claim to sticky recurring revenues supplying franchise stores with food ingredients, marketing, and employee training. Importantly, McDonald's owns the land beneath the majority of its franchisee restaurants; that huge land portfolio gives McDonald's more in common with a REIT than with the diner down the street.

The competitive nature of the fast food business means that MCD has gotten the squeeze in recent quarters as it tries to play catch up with a consumer that's moving up the "food chain" (so to speak) -- an ongoing initiative to improve food quality and make MCD more nimble should pay dividends down the road. In the meantime, McDonald's continues to execute well, especially given the discount currently on shares versus six months ago. The firm's 3.6% dividend yield should add some extra attractiveness given the prolonged low-interest rate environment that's expected to stretch well into 2015.

It looks like funds are making a mistake by selling MCD early here...

Qualcomm

Qualcomm (QCOM) is another name that's "bored" performance-focused hedge funds into selling: Qualcomm has been a laggard this year, only earning total returns of 5.5% so far in 2014. Funds sold 2.88 million shares of the wireless technology stock in the most recent quarter, a quarter-billion dollar stake at current price levels.

Qualcomm is a chipmaker that produces everything from processors to wireless communications cards. The firm's flagship Snapdragon processors provide OEMs with a completely integrated solution that can handle processing tasks, but also includes baseband features that connect to cellular networks. As handset makers continue to try to pack more features into the same device footprint, QCOM's expertise is increasingly valuable. That's why its products are found in nearly every middle to high-end smartphone on the market today.

The firm also a major a major tech IP licensor. The Qualcomm's patents effectively mean that every handset maker in the world has to pay royalties if they want their phones to operate on 3G and 4G networks. That makes QCOM a great pure play on the smartphone market as a whole. Likewise, Qualcomm is in stellar financial shape, with close to $33 billion in cash and investments on its balance sheet, and no debt. That's works out to almost $20 per share in cash and investments, enough to cover a quarter of QCOM's market capitalization today.

Ex-cash, shares trade for 13.9 -- a pretty cheap multiple given the handset growth expected in emerging markets over the next few years. Don't follow funds' sale of this stock.

American Express

Last up on pro investors' hate list is American Express (AXP).

American Express is the No. 3 payment network in the world, behind Visa (V) and MasterCard (MA), positioning that gives it a front-row seat to the fast adoption of electronic payments. Because AXP's network is closed-loop (it's the issuer on the majority of its cards), it enjoys some hard-to-replicate advantages over those peers. By focusing on attracting high-spending affluent consumers and businesses with its rewards programs and benefits (instead of focusing on issuing credit in volume), the firm owns a profitable niche in its flagship charge card products. And it collects bigger fees for its trouble.

Charge card products limit AXP's exposure to credit risk, while expanding programs with third-party lenders have been growing the firm's transaction volume. While mobile payments were seen as a risk to American Express' business, the fact that the recently-launched Apple Pay platform integrates the existing networks means that mobile payments could actually help entrench AXP's share of the market.

Last quarter, funds sold off 192,000 shares of American Express, making it the single most-hated name in the financial sector. AmEx looks like another one where the funds got it wrong...

-- Written by Jonas Elmerraji in Baltimore.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in the stocks mentioned.
Jonas Elmerraji, CMT, is a senior market analyst at Agora Financial in Baltimore and a contributor to TheStreet. Before that, he managed a portfolio of stocks for an investment advisory returned 15% in 2008. He has been featured in Forbes , Investor's Business Daily, and on CNBC.com. Jonas holds a degree in financial economics from UMBC and the Chartered Market Technician designation.


Follow Jonas on Twitter @JonasElmerraji

 


Monday, December 22, 2014

Tax Breaks for Dependent-Care Expenses

My husband and I both work and have more than $20,000 in annual day-care expenses for our two children. We have dependent-care flexible-spending accounts at work and contribute $5,000 between the two of us. Can we also claim the child-care tax credit for our additional expenses? If not, is it better to use the money from the dependent-care FSAs or to take the child-care credit?

See Also: SLIDE SHOW: 50 Ways to Cut Your Health Care Costs

Because you have two children in day care and pay more than $6,000 a year for their care, you can use the $5,000 from your flexible spending accounts and also claim the child-care credit for up to $1,000 of expenses.

Unless you have a very low income, it's generally better to use money from your dependent-care FSAs first. Contributing to a dependent-care FSA generally gives you a bigger break than taking the child-care credit because the money you put aside avoids not only federal income taxes but also the 7.65% Social Security and Medicare tax. It may escape state income taxes, too. If you're in the 25% federal tax bracket and pay 5% in state taxes, for example, you would save $1,883 in taxes.

The child-care credit, on the other hand, is worth 20% to 35% of the cost of care (depending on your income), on up to $3,000 of child-care costs for one child or $6,000 for two or more children. The credit is worth 20% of eligible expenses if you earn more than $43,000 per year, so if you choose that route rather than the FSA, the most it can reduce your tax liability is by $600 for one child or $1,200 for two or more children if your income is above that level.

.kip-article-advertisement h5 {display:none}

If you use $5,000 from your dependent-care FSAs, you can't claim the child-care credit for the same expenses. But because the child-care tax credit limit is based on $6,000 of expenses per year if you have two or more kids and file jointly, as single or as head of household, and the FSA limit is $5,000 per household ($2,500 per person if married filing separately), you can claim up to $1,000 in additional expenses for the credit. That can reduce your tax liability by an extra $200 to $350, depending on your income.

You can use money from the a dependent-care FSA or take the child-care credit for the cost of care for your children under age 13 while you work or look for work (both spouses must work, unless one is a full-time student). The cost of day care, a nanny or preschool counts, as do the costs of before-school and after-school care and summer day camp.

For more information about the child-care credit, see IRS Publication 503 Child and Dependent Care Expenses

Got a question? Ask Kim at askkim@kiplinger.com.



Sunday, December 21, 2014

Sotheby's Slips On Downbeat Earnings; NVIDIA Shares Surge

Related BZSUM Markets Up As Russia Seeks To End Military Activity Near Ukraine Markets Rise; Zynga Lowers 2014 Forecast

Midway through trading Friday, the Dow traded up 0.46 percent to 16,443.64 while the NASDAQ surged 0.31 percent to 4,348.31. The S&P also rose, gaining 0.45 percent to 1,918.08.

Leading and Lagging Sectors

Utilities shares surged around 0.87 percent in today’s trading. Meanwhile, top gainers in the sector included WGL Holdings (NYSE: WGL), up 6.3 percent, and Genie Energy (NYSE: GNE), up 2.4 percent.

In trading on Friday, telecommunications services shares were relative laggards, down on the day by about 0.01 percent. Meanwhile, top decliners in the sector included NQ Mobile (NYSE: NQ), down 4.1 percent, and Cogent Communications Holdings (NASDAQ: CCOI), off 2.4 percent.

Top Headline

Zynga (NASDAQ: ZNGA) on Thursday posted downbeat second-quarter revenue and lowered its 2014 earnings forecast. The company also issued a weak revenue forecast for the current quarter.

Zynga's adjusted EPS came in at $0.00, versus analysts’ estimates of $0.00 per share. However, its revenue dropped to $153.20 million, missing estimates of $191.21 million.

The company cut its FY14 EPS forecast from $0.01-$0.03 to $(0.01).

Equities Trading UP

Mercadolibre (NASDAQ: MELI) shares shot up 14.43 percent to $105.78 after the company reported stronger-than-expected quarterly results.

Shares of Air Methods (NASDAQ: AIRM) got a boost, shooting up 11.86 percent to $59.50 on upbeat quarterly results.

NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) shares were also up, gaining 7.22 percent to $18.72 after the company posted higher Q2 earnings and issued a strong revenue forecast for the current quarter.

Equities Trading DOWN

Shares of Post Holdings (NYSE: POST) were down 17.52 percent to $36.71 after the company reported a Q3 loss of $0.30 per share on revenue of $633.0 million. The company also announced its plans to acquire American Blanching Company. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey downgraded Post Holdings from Buy to Hold and lowered the price target from $70.00 to $45.00.

Volcano (NASDAQ: VOLC) shares tumbled 23.57 percent to $12.06 on Q2 results. The company reported Q2 earnings of $0.01 per share on revenue of $102.60 million. Volcano announced its plans to divest its Axsun Technologies subsidiary and also announced the litigation settlement agreement with St. Jude Medical (NYSE: STJ). Oppenheimer downgraded Volcano from Outperform to Market Perform and lowered the price target from $22.00 to $15.00.

Sotheby's (NYSE: BID) was down, falling 9.30 percent to $36.90 after the company reported weaker-than-expected second-quarter earnings.

Commodities

In commodity news, oil traded up 0.04 percent to $97.38, while gold traded down 0.05 percent to $1,311.90.

Silver traded down 0.18 percent Friday to $19.96, while copper rose 0.11 percent to $3.18.

Eurozone

European shares were mostly lower today. The eurozone’s STOXX 600 fell 0.65 percent, the Spanish Ibex Index gained 0.27 percent, while Italy’s FTSE MIB Index surged 0.37 percent. Meanwhile, the German DAX fell 0.28 percent and the French CAC 40 declined 0.10 percent while UK shares dipped 0.50 percent.

Economics

US productivity rose 2.5% in the second quarter, versus a revised 4.5% fall in the earlier quarter. However, economists were projecting a 1.6% rise in productivity. Unit-labor costs climbed 0.6% in the quarter, versus an 11.8% rise in the prior quarter.

US wholesale inventories rose 0.3% in June, while sales climbed 0.2% in the month.

Posted-In: Earnings News Guidance Downgrades Eurozone Futures Price Target Commodities

© 2014 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

  Most Popular 4 Ebola Researching Biotech Companies For Your Portfolio Earnings Scheduled For August 7, 2014 Macquarie: Ignored Line In Apple's Quarterly Reports Is Key To Growth Morning Market Losers Brian Kelly Is Bearish On Apple 3 Reasons To Go Long In Warren Buffett's Favorite Bank Related Articles (AIRM + BID) Markets Up As Russia Seeks To End Military Activity Near Ukraine Sotheby's Slips On Downbeat Earnings; NVIDIA Shares Surge Southeby's Tanking On Q2 Earnings Miss Markets Rise; Zynga Lowers 2014 Forecast Benzinga's Volume Movers

Saturday, December 20, 2014

5 Stocks Set to Soar on Bullish Earnings

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- Short-sellers hate being caught short a stock that reports a blowout quarter. When this happens, we often see a tradable short squeeze develop as the bears rush to cover their positions to avoid big losses. Even the best short-sellers know that it's never a great idea to stay short once a bullish earnings report sparks a big short-covering rally.

>>5 Rocket Stocks to Buy for Blastoff Earnings Season Gains



This is why I scan the market for heavily shorted stocks that are about to report earnings. You only need to find a few of these stocks in a year to help enhance your portfolio returns. The gains become so outsized in such a short time frame that your profits add up quickly.

That said, let's not forget that stocks are heavily shorted for a reason, so you have to use trading discipline and sound money management when playing earnings short-squeeze candidates. It's important that you don't go betting the farm on these plays and that you manage your risk accordingly. Sometimes the best play is to wait for the stock to break out following the report before you jump in to profit off a short squeeze. This way, you're letting the trend emerge after the market has digested all of the news.

Of course, sometimes the stock is going to be in such high demand that you risk missing a lot of the move by waiting. That's why it can be worth betting prior to the report -- but only if the stock is acting technically very bullish and you have a very strong conviction that it is going to rip higher. Just remember that even when you have that conviction and have done your due diligence, the stock can still get hammered if Wall Street doesn't like the numbers or guidance.

>>5 Stocks Ready for Breakouts


If you do decide to bet ahead of a quarter, then you might want to use options to limit your capital exposure. Heavily shorted stocks are usually the names that make the biggest post-earnings moves and have the most volatility. I personally prefer to wait until all the earnings-related news is out for a heavily shorted stock and then jump in and trade the prevailing trend.

With that in mind, here's a look at several stocks that could experience big short squeezes when they report earnings this week.

Cliffs Natural Resources

My first earnings short-squeeze trade idea is mining and natural resources player Cliffs Natural Resources (CLF), which is set to release numbers on Thursday before the market open. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Cliffs Natural Resources to report revenue of $1.19 billion on a loss of 5 cents per share.

>>3 Stocks Spiking on Unusual Volume

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Cliffs Natural Resources is extremely high at 33%. That means that out of the 144.69 million shares in the tradable float, 53.13 million shares are sold short by the bears. If the bulls get the earnings news they're looking for, then shares of Cliffs Natural Resources could easily explode sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their bets.

From a technical perspective, CLF is currently trending below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bearish. This stock has been uptrending a bit over the last month and change, with shares moving higher from its low of $13.60 to its recent high of $16.50 a share. During that move, shares of CLF have been making mostly higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of CLF within range of triggering a big breakout trade post-earnings above some key overhead resistance levels.

If you're bullish on CLF, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $16 to $16.50 a share and then above more resistance at $16.63 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average volume of 5.10 million shares. If that breakout hits post-earnings, then CLF will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $17.96 to $19 a share, or even its 200-day moving average of $20.12 to $22 a share.

I would simply avoid CLF or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support levels at $14.95 to $14.45 a share high volume. If we get that move, then CLF will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week low of $13.60 a share. Any move below $13.60 would then push shares of CLF into new 52-week-low territory, which is bearish technical price action.

Chemed

Another potential earnings short-squeeze play is hospice and palliative care provider Chemed (CHE), which is set to release its numbers on Wednesday after the market close. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Chemed to report revenue $363.73 million on earnings of $1.47 per share.

>>4 Hot Stocks to Trade (or Not)

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Chemed is extremely high at 33%. That means that out of the 16.95 million shares in the tradable float, 6 million shares are sold short by the bears. This is an enormous short interest on a stock with a very low tradable float. If the bulls get the earnings news they're looking for, then shares of CHE could easily rip sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their trades.

From a technical perspective, CHE is currently trending above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bullish. This stock has been uptrending strong for the last three months, with shares moving higher from its low of $80.76 to its recent high of $98 a share. During that uptrend, shares of CHE have been consistently making higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of CHE within range of triggering a major breakout trade post-earnings.

If you're in the bull camp on CHE, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above its 52-week high of $98 a share (or above Wednesday's intraday high if greater) with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 200,398 shares. If that breakout kicks off post-earnings, then CHE will set up to enter new 52-week-high territory, which is bullish technical price action. Some possible upside targets off that breakout are $120 to $130 a share.

I would simply avoid CHE or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then drops back below some key near-term support at $94 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then CHE will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major support levels at its 50-day moving average of $91.42 to $88 a share, or even $84 a share.

VMware

Another potential earnings short-squeeze candidate is virtualization infrastructure solutions provider VMware (VMW), which is set to release numbers on Tuesday after the market close. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect VMware to report revenue of $1.44 billion on earnings of 79 cents per share.

>>3 Huge Tech Stocks on Traders' Radars

Just recently, Wells Fargo downgraded shares of VMware to market perform saying it will be difficult for the company to sustain mid-teens growth in 2015. Wells lowered its price target range for the stock to $98 to $105 from $107 to $117.

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for VMware is extremely high at 21%. That means that out of the 80.24 million shares in the tradable float, 16.75 million shares are sold short by the bears. If this company can deliver the earnings news the bulls are looking for, then shares of VMware could easily soar sharply higher post-earnings as the bears jump to cover some of their positions.

From a technical perspective, VMW is currently trending above its 50-day and its 200-day moving averages, which is bullish. This stock has been trending sideways and basing for the last two months, with shares moving between around $92 on the downside and $99.13 on the upside. Any high-volume move above the upper-end of its recent sideways trading chart pattern post-earnings could easily trigger a major breakout trade for shares of VMW.

If you're bullish on VMW, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels $99.13 to $99.14 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 1.49 million shares. If that breakout begins post-earnings, then VMW will set up to re-fill some of its previous gap-down-day zone from April that started at $107.32 a share. If that gap gets filled with volume, the VMW will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week high of $112.89 a share.

I would avoid VMW or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then takes out its 200-day moving average of $92.90 to more near-term support at $92.69 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then VMW will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major support levels at $88.64 to $86.88 a share. Any high-volume move below those levels will then give VMW a chance to tag $80 a share.

Hercules Offshore

Another earnings short-squeeze prospect is oil and gas drilling exploration player Hercules Offshore (HERO), which is set to release numbers on Wednesday before the market open. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Hercules Offshore to report revenue of $243.40 million on earnings of 1 cent per share.

>>5 Stocks With Big Insider Buying

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Hercules Offshore is pretty high at 11.8%. That means that out of the 155.41 million shares in the tradable float, 15.04 million shares are sold short by the bears. The bears have also been increasing their bets from the last reporting period by 15%, or by around 2.37 million shares. If the bears get caught pressing their bets into a bullish quarter, then shares of HERO could easily surge sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their positions.

From a technical perspective, HERO is currently trending below its 50-day and is 200-day moving averages, which is bearish. This stock has been basing and consolidating for the last month, with shares moving between $3.90 on the downside and $4.28 on the upside. Any high-volume move above the upper-end of its recent sideways trading chart pattern post-earnings could easily trigger a big breakout trade for shares of HERO.

If you're bullish on HERO, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance at $4.15 to $4.28 a share and then above its 50-day moving average of $4.36 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average action of 4.98 million shares. If that breakout gets underway post-earnings, then HERO will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at around $4.70 to $5 a share, or even its 200-day moving average of $5.29 a share.

I would simply avoid HERO or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout and then takes out its 52-week low of $3.90 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then HERO will set up to enter new 52-week-low territory, which is bearish technical price action. Some possible downside targets off that move are $3.50 to $3 a share, or even below $3 a share.

Janus Capital Group

My final earnings short-squeeze trade idea is asset management player Janus Capital Group (JNS), which is set to release numbers on Wednesday before the market open. Wall Street analysts, on average, expect Janus Capital Group to report revenue of $235.49 million on earnings of 18 cents per share.

The current short interest as a percentage of the float for Janus Capital Group is very high at 15%. That means that out of the 181.28 million shares in the tradable float, 27.30 million shares are sold short by the bears. If this company can deliver the earnings news the bulls are looking for, then shares of JNS could easily rip sharply higher post-earnings as the bears rush to cover some of their bets.

From a technical perspective, JNS is currently trending above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, which is bullish. This stock has been uptrending strong for the last three months and change, with shares moving higher from its low of $10.06 to its recent high of $12.93 a share. During that uptrend, shares of JNS have been making mostly higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of JNS within range of triggering a big breakout trade post-earnings.

If you're in the bull camp on JNS, then I would wait until after its report and look for long-biased trades if this stock manages to break out above some near-term overhead resistance levels at $12.93 to its 52-week high of $13.10 a share with high volume. Look for volume on that move that hits near or above its three-month average volume of 2.39 million shares. If that breakout hits post-earnings, then JNS will set up to enter new 52-week-high territory, which is bullish technical price action. Some possible upside targets off that breakout are $17 to $20 a share.

I would avoid JNS or look for short-biased trades if after earnings it fails to trigger that breakout, and then drops back below its 50-day moving average of $12.13 a share with high volume. If we get that move, then JNS will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major support levels at $11.68 to its 200-day moving average of $11.16 a share.

To see more potential earnings short squeeze plays, check out the Earnings Short-Squeeze Plays portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>5 Big Stocks to Trade for Gains This Summer



>>Beat the S&P With 5 Stocks Everyone Else Hates



>>5 Defense Stocks to Trade for Gains This Week

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com.

You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Friday, December 19, 2014

GM was warned by its own lawyers on recall debacle

mary barra 071714 GM lawyers warned that the automaker risked being hit with severe and costly legal penalties for the way it handled the flawed ignition switch. NEW YORK (CNNMoney) General Motors was warned by its own lawyers at least four times that it risked being hit with severe and costly legal penalties for the way it handled the flawed ignition switch tied to at least 13 deaths, according to a Senate hearing Thursday.

So-called punitive damages are awarded in a lawsuit to compensate plaintiffs beyond their actual losses. Sen. Claire McCaskill, the Missouri Democrat, revealed that these warnings took place between 2010 and early 2013 as she questioned GM general counsel Mike Millikin. She noted that the threat of punitive damages should have been a "blinking red light" for GM (GENERAL MOTORS) officials.

But the warnings apparently never reached top executives at the automaker, including Millikin who testified before the Senate panel along with CEO Mary Barra.

"This is either gross negligence or gross incompetence on the part of a lawyer," said McCaskill. She also said she could not understand why Millikin and other top lawyers at GM had not been fired.

But Barra defended Millikin.

"I have made the promise to fix what happened in the company," she said. "To do that I need the right team. Mike Milikin is a man of tremendously high integrity."

Several lower ranking attorneys were fired after an internal investigation into GM's failure handling the recall.

Millikin testified for the first time Thursday, saying he was deeply sorry for the deaths tied to the recall. He testified he was not aware of the ignition problems at the center of the recall crisis until February 2013, even though the company had settled some lawsuits involving the cars long before then.

Other senators also urged that Millikin be fired as well.

"It's shocking to me you would be general counsel...and you wouldn't have known," Republican Sen. Kelly Ayotte told Millikin.

The senators were also angry that when GM refused to answer questions from regulators years ago it invoked attorney-client privilege several times.

"If GM is really serious about changing its culture and imposing a new era of truth telling, the place to start is your legal department," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal.

The is the fourth time that Barra has testified before congress about the recall crisis, and senators were generally less hostile to the CEO this time around. McCaskill, who has been a fierce critic, praised Barra for the steps she has taken.

IRS Email Hunt Shows Lerner Switched To Texts, Which Aren't Kept....'Perfect'

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has ordered the IRS to explain what happened to Lois Lerner's emails. Judicial Watch sued when the IRS refused to provide them. DOJ tried hard to block it but lost. The legal wrangling is just one more seedy chapter in a scandal that casts further doubt on the tax system.

Still, it may bring a smile to the face of more than a few American taxpayers who have ever had to hunt for a receipt to hand over to the IRS. Will the IRS comply? It is harder to end-run a Judge than Congressional investigators. Yet the IRS seems pretty savvy at stalling. Besides, there's a new wrinkle: Texts aren't emails.

Remember the old saying, "if you don't ask (for exactly the right thing), you don't get?" Oh, you mean there are texts too? Yes, some of the real juice may be in text or instant messages. Indeed, in 2013 when the IRS targeting scandal was already brewing, Ms. Lerner asked an IRS IT specialist if the IRS saved texts? No, they are not automatically saved, came back the response.

English: mobile phone text message

text message (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The IT person went on to say that saving them was possible, though, so be careful. "Perfect," was Ms. Lerner's response. Congressional investigators, Judicial Watch and others doubtless want those texts, especially since it now appears that there was a little more off-the-grid mentality when it came to texts.

Meanwhile, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen is beginning to look a little like Sergeant Schulz on Hogan's Heroes. The latter was beloved for his outbursts of, "I know nothing!" Many Republicans think former IRS official Lois Lerner knows a lot. But Mr. Koskinen seems not to.

He was unaware of the instant-messaging system, he testified. With a kind of thousand yard stare, the top U.S. tax official still professed to a House committee that he didn't think this interchange of IT question and answer meant Ms. Lerner was happy that the instant messages weren't saved. It may be that 'perfect' means different things to different people.

In any case, the IRS wants to let the Inspector General finish his investigation of the computer failures. Then, the IRS can decide what further steps it should take. Hopefully that will be a bit more than an effort to "Round Up The Usual Suspects!" 

Ms. Lerner's lawyer continues to state that his client did nothing wrong. The IRS probably would like to forget her, and her emails too. Oh, and her texts too. She is retired now on a government pension, but conceivably could still face prosecution.

She refused to testify on multiple occasions, and she was eventually held in contempt of Congress for it. After making a statement in which she said she had done nothing wrong, Ms. Lerner invoked her constitutional right against self-incrimination. But some Republicans say her statement amounted to a waiver. Her case was turned over to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. IRS Official Lerner Could Face 11 Years In Prison For Tea Party Scandal.

You can reach me at Wood@WoodLLP.com. This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.

 

 

 

Wednesday, December 17, 2014

HereĆ¢€™s Why Breitburn Energy Partners L.P. Spiked Almost 10% on Wednesday

What: Breitburn Energy Partners  (NASDAQ: BBEP  ) participated in today's oil stock relief rally. At one point, units were up over 13% before cooling off by mid-afternoon. Still, after the beating units have taken the past two weeks, it must be nice to have some relief from the constant drop in value.

BBEP Price Chart

BBEP Price data by YCharts.

Today's energy surge was fueled by rising oil prices. After a nearly unabated sell-off over the past few months, oils prices were up about 2.5% in late afternoon trading. A smaller than expected decline in crude inventories helped spark the rally.

So what: Despite today's stock rally, it has still been an awful week for Breitburn Energy investors. Units are still down 16% over the past five days as investors worry about the company's ability to maintain its payout given high debt levels that are growing more threatening due to crashing oil prices.

Now what: Breitburn Energy's history shows it is capable of surviving tough times. However, that doesn't mean the worst is over: Oil prices could always resume their descent, which would take Breitburn Energy along for the ride. Investors can expect a lot of volatility until the oil markets settle down and there is more clarity surrounding Breitburn Energy's future direction.

1 stock that could be the "Income Play of a Lifetime"
The Motley Fool's top analysts have uncovered a largely unknown way you can profit from the growth of wireless that could double your money on top of paying you a growing, LEGALLY GUARANTEED income stream every single quarter. To get the full story, simply click here.

Thursday, November 27, 2014

Week's Winners, Losers: Authors Sign for Barnes & Noble

Hillary Clinton Los Angeles Nick Ut/APHillary Rodham Clinton has signed copies of her book for Barnes & Noble. There were plenty of winners and losers this week, with the last major bookstore chain landing some star power to make its holiday sales ring up and a renter of movies and games on discs playing Grinch with a seasonally silly price hike. Here's a rundown of the week's smartest moves and biggest blunders. Twitter (TWTR) -- Loser It seems that a week doesn't go by without a company making a social media mistake, usually in the form of posting a controversial or insensitive tweet. This week it was Twitter itself that blew it. Twitter CFO Anthony Noto posted a public tweet on Monday that apparently was intended as a private direct message to somebody. "We should buy them," he writes, likely discussing an unnamed acquisition target, and pointing to a mid-December meeting. "We will need to sell him," he concludes. "I have a plan." It's good to know that even Twitter is human. Apple (AAPL) -- Winner It's a safe bet that Apple's going to be selling plenty of iPads, Macs, and iPhones this holiday shopping weekend, and at least one analyst wants to get in ahead of the customers. Susquehanna's Chris Caso is raising his price target on Apple from $120 to $135, encouraged by the improving production and sales trends of the pricier iPhone 6 Plus. The larger smartphone sells for $100 more than the comparable iPhone 6, but it doesn't cost that much more to make. In other words, Apple scores a larger profit from the iPhone 6 Plus than the iPhone 6. Redbox -- Loser It's going to cost a little more to check out a DVD, Blu-ray, or video game from a Redbox machine. Parent company Outerwall (OUTR) announced this week that it's raising its rates. The daily-rental rates will go from $1.20 to $1.50 for DVDs, from $1.50 to $2 for Blu-ray discs, and from $2 to $3 for video games. The market applauded the move by sending the stock higher on the announcement, but are we forgetting that Redbox was having a hard time growing its rental business at the old rate? Outerwall's latest quarter found Redbox rentals declining 13.7 percent over the prior year's period. Making rentals even more expensive is only going to drive more video buffs to digital and on-demand rentals. Barnes & Noble (BKS) -- Winner Leave it to the last remaining major book superstore chain to come up with a novel way to drum up traffic. Barnes & Noble is making Black Friday interesting by offering 500,000 signed editions of more than 100 books available exclusively at its stores. We're talking about famous authors including Dan Brown and Anne Rice, but also celebrity writers including Amy Poehler, George W. Bush, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Joel Osteen. This should bring some serious buzz back to the booksellers that normally sit out the early days of the holiday shopping season. Barbie -- Loser Barbie's reign atop the National Retail Federation's annual survey of most coveted toys has come to an end. Mattel's (MAT) Barbie has topped the list since it began tracking parent holiday purchasing intentions 11 years ago, but this time the pole position belongs to Disney's (DIS) "Frozen" franchise. One in five parents plan to buy "Frozen" items for their daughters, beating out Barbie, which will be on the shopping list of 17 percent of parents. Let's just hope that we never have to buy a Malibu Anna or an Elsa Beach House. More from Rick Aristotle Munarriz
•Last Week's Biggest Stock Movers: Deals Lift Dish •Wall Street This Week: Deere Before the Turkey •You Don't Need to Be Rich to Ride the Hotel Boom

Friday, November 21, 2014

Graco Recalls 5 Million Strollers Over Finger Amputations

graco stroller recall finger injuries amputations cspc.gov Nearly 5 million Graco strollers are being recalled in North America after at least a half-dozen reports of children's fingers getting cut off in the hinges, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission said on Thursday. At least 11 incidents have been reported involving finger injuries in the popular strollers including the six fingertip amputations and four partial amputations. A nearly identical recall was conducted by Graco in 2010, which followed a similar recall a few months earlier by competitor Maclaren. The number of strollers involved in this recall, however, is far larger. This recall, which involves 4.7 million strollers in the U.S. and 202,000 in Canada, includes 11 models of Graco stroller: Aspen, Breeze, Capri, Cirrus, Glider, Kite, LiteRider, Sierra, Solara, Sterling, and TravelMate Model Strollers and Travel Systems. The China-made strollers were sold at major retailers including Target (TGT), Toys R Us, Walmart (WMT) and Amazon.com (AMZN), from August 2000 utnil this month for about $40 to $70 for the stroller and $140 to $170 for the travel system. A full list of models is available here. If you have one of the strollers you should contact Graco to receive a free repair kit, which includes hinge covers. The kit will be available starting next month. In the interim,"caregivers should exercise extreme care when unfolding the stroller to be certain that the hinges are firmly locked before placing a child in the stroller," the CPSC said. "Caregivers are advised to immediately remove the child from a stroller that begins to fold to keep their fingers from the side hinge area." You can contact Graco Children's Products at 800-345-4109 weekdays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Eastern time, or visit the company's recall site. The Apple Watch doesn't come out until 2015, and it's going to cost you at least $350. The VTech Kidizoom Smartwatch is out now and only costs $60. It's clear which smartwatch is going to wind up dominating the market.

Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Rich Kids Twice as Likely to Have College Debt Now Than in 1992

'Group of college students in the university amphitheatre, they are sitting and doing an exam.' skynesher More than two out of three college graduates now leave school with student loan debt. And the debt they carry out of school these days -- a median of nearly $27,000 as of 2011 -- is "more than twice that of college graduates 20 years ago." These are two conclusions cited in a recent Pew Research Center analysis of government data on student loan debt. But they're not the most startling conclusions. According to Pew, the biggest increase in student borrowing over the last 20 years has been among the wealthy. Pity the Poor Kids As you'd expect, Pew data shows that student loan debt in America is most often concentrated among students of limited financial means. According to Pew, the majority -- 56 percent -- of student loan debt today is borne by students from the lower and lower-middle income classes. Indeed, 77 percent of low-income students, hailing from families making less than $44,432 per year, now leave college with at least some student loan debt. Seventy percent of lower-middle-class students (from families earning $44,432 to $83,406) are in similar straits. And even among upper-middle-class students (from families earning $83,407 to $125,772), 62 percent come out of college burdened by debt. Pity the Rich Kids, Too As for students from what Pew terms the high-income stratum -- families earning $125,773 and up -- 50 percent of such "rich kids" now carry student loan debt into their post-baccalaureate lives. That's a much smaller proportion of kids carrying debt than is found among students less-well-off. But it's still twice the percentage of such kids carrying student loans as we saw back in 1992. That's the biggest jump in the proportion of students carrying loan debt found among any of the four income strata surveyed by Pew. Indeed, the prevalence of student loan debt among high-income students has grown more than twice as fast as such loans have grown among low-income students. And student loan debt among upper-middle-class students is growing nearly as fast as among the rich. But why? The rising cost of college (and even of college textbooks!) surely explains part of the problem. Tuition costs have nearly sextupled over the past three decades. Textbook prices are up even more -- an astounding 812 percent increase in 30 years. And with the majority of parents leaving it to their kids to buy their own textbooks -- which can cost as much as $1,200 a year for a full course load -- this alone could push some kids to take on some debt.

Wednesday, November 5, 2014

Worst Performing Industries For November 5, 2014

Related SSYS Piper Jaffray: Stratasys Shareholders Need 'Patience' Stratasys Tops Analysts Q3 Expectations, Issues Weak Guidance Making Money With Charles Payne: 10/14/14 (Fox Business) Related LPX Earnings Scheduled For November 5, 2014 Top Performing Industries For October 15, 2014 Home Improvement Stocks Tumble (Fox Business)

The Dow gained 0.39% to 17,452.04, while the NASDAQ composite index climbed 0.13% to 4,629.63. The broader Standard & Poor's 500 index rose 0.41% to 2,020.30.

The worst performing industries in the market today are:

Computer Peripherals:

The industry dropped 5.54% by 11:00 am. The worst performer in this industry was Stratasys (NASDAQ: SSYS), which declined 11.7%. Stratasys lowered its profit forecast.

Building Materials Wholesale:

This industry fell 4.53% by 11:00 am ET. Louisiana-Pacific (NYSE: LPX) shares dropped 5% in today's trading. Louisiana-Pacific reported downbeat quarterly earnings.

Photographic Equipment & Supplies:

This industry tumbled 2.45% by 11:00 am. The worst stock within the industry was GoPro (NASDAQ: GPRO), which fell 2.1%. GoPro's PEG ratio is 2.16.

Basic Materials Wholesale:

This industry declined 1.76% by 11:00 am, with Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (NYSE: MIC) moving down 2.1%. Macquarie Infrastructure priced 1.3 million shares at $70.88 per share.

Posted-In: Worst Performing IndustriesNews Intraday Update Markets Movers

© 2014 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

  Related Articles (LPX + GPRO) Worst Performing Industries For November 5, 2014 Jim Cramer Shares View On GoPro Earnings Scheduled For November 5, 2014 CNBC's Stock Pops & Drops From November 3: GoPro, Gilead Sciences And More GoPro Makes This Financial Analyst Nervous 4 Things Twitter Is Saying About GoPro Around the Web, We're Loving... World Cup Championship of Binary Options! Huanity's Last Great Hope: Venture Capitalists Don't Miss The Next Webinar to Advance your Trading